Malaysia

Appellate court fixes verdict on smoking ban appeal for November 23

Judges say more time needed to deliberate on issues raised by counsel

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 08 Sep 2022 4:23PM

Appellate court fixes verdict on smoking ban appeal for November 23
The Court of Appeal has fixed November 23 to give its verdict on the appeal by seven individuals who are seeking to quash the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking in all eateries. – The Vibes file pic, September 8, 2022

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal has fixed November 23 to give its verdict on the appeal by seven individuals who are seeking to quash the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking in all eateries.

Justice Datuk Yaacob Md Sam, leading a three-member panel, said they needed more time to deliberate on the issues raised by counsel in the appeal, which were important and of public interest.

The two other judges presiding on the panel were Court of Appeal judge, Datuk M. Gunalan and high court judge, Datuk Lim Chong Fong.

The seven individuals are appealing against the October 29, 2019 decision of the Kuala Lumpur High Court in dismissing their judicial review application to get a certiorari order to quash the Health Ministry's decision to ban smoking at eateries.

The seven are Mohd Hanizam Yunus, 55, Zulkifli Mohamad, 60, Mohd Laisani Dollah, 49, Mohd Sufian Awaludin, 38, Ridzuan Muhammad Noor, 56, Mohd Yazid Mohd Yunus, 51, and Yuri Azhar Abdollah, 43.

At the court proceedings conducted online, lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla representing the individuals, argued that a smoking ban enforced at eateries was unconstitutional, illegal and unreasonable as it was made without proper and thorough research.

He said before the enforcement of the smoking ban at eateries in 2019, smokers in Malaysia could smoke in a special zone provided by owners of air-conditioned and non-air conditioned eateries.

“We submit that this situation is more balanced to the rights of smokers as well as non-smokers where non-smoking patrons at the eateries can choose to sit at a designated place that prohibits smoking and smokers can smoke in places with the open-air concept,” he added.

Haniff said the high court judge had erred in law and in fact, in deciding that his clients' rights under Article 5 of the federal constitution had not been violated and smokers had not been discriminated against under Article 8 of the federal constitution following enforcement of the smoking ban at eateries.

Senior federal counsel, Shamsul Bolhassan, representing the Health Ministry, submitted that banning smoking in eateries was not unreasonable and illegal.

“The right to smoke is not a fundamental right to livelihood, and if individuals choose to smoke, they have to respect the right of non-smokers, and they (smokers) have to move three metres away from the eateries to smoke.

“The law was enacted to ban smoking at eateries, taking into consideration public health and quality of life,” he added.

In their judicial review filed on December 31, 2018 naming the Health Ministry as respondent, the seven men who had set up a society called Persatuan Pertahankan Perokok sought a declaration that the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking at eateries was unconstitutional.

They claimed that smokers had equal rights with non-smokers to visit and spend their time at food premises for as long as they wished and that the government did not provide adequate facilities such as smoking areas or include provisions under the smoking ban for eatery operators to prepare their own non-smoking areas.

On January 1, 2019, the Health Ministry imposed a ban on smoking at all restaurants and food premises. – Bernama, September 8, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 1mth

Court quashes RM313.8 million tax bill against Na’imah

Malaysia / 4mth

Court of Appeal: Emergency proclamations beyond judicial review

Malaysia / 6mth

Family takes issue of government responsibility in Altantuya's death to Federal Court

Malaysia / 7mth

Court of Appeal rejects Najib’s bid to reinstate RM1.9m civil suit against Tommy Thomas

Malaysia / 10mth

Daim's family gets judicial review to challenge MACC account freeze

Malaysia / 10mth

Altantuya's father granted leave to seek judicial review of probe into Azilah's affidavit

Spotlight

Malaysia

Long Lellang helicopter crash: Remains of 5 victims to be returned to families today

Malaysia

UMNO-PAS relations. Are things as rosy as it seems?

Malaysia

‘The bridge has been burned’: UMNO-PH ties face growing strain as attacks turn increasingly open

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

20 years ago, woman bought gold bangle for RM2k, now sold for RM18k

World

Nepal flood survivor rescued after 10 days trapped in hydropower tunnel

Malaysia

Anwar, Putin agree on mechanism to fast-track Malaysia-Russia deals

Malaysia

Selangor declares Oct 25 public holiday for Sultan’s Silver Jubilee

Malaysia

Najib’s pardon application deferred

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

World

Magnitude 4.1 tremor hits southern Lebanon after Israeli blasts target Hezbollah tunnels

Education

UiTM probes alleged sale of hostel room placements at Puncak Alam

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

Malaysia

Johor domestic violence cases surge to 823 in seven months, up from 518 in 2025

Malaysia

Ab Rauf: Melaka voters to decide state government’s strategic partners

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

GE16: BN-PN may get the Malay votes, but Sabah, Sarawak remain kingmakers

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Only frame left after Porsche catches fire along LPT1

Malaysia

Malaysia seeks Nepal deal to establish status of 55 Malaysians still unaccounted for

Malaysia

Second pilot accused of moving drug proceeds in RM45m Jakarta case

Malaysia

Haze: Sarawak accounts for 11 of 15 unhealthy air quality areas

Malaysia

Pre-crash video shows FDS helicopter door difficult to close (video)