Malaysia

Appellate court fixes verdict on smoking ban appeal for November 23

Judges say more time needed to deliberate on issues raised by counsel

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 08 Sep 2022 4:23PM

Appellate court fixes verdict on smoking ban appeal for November 23
The Court of Appeal has fixed November 23 to give its verdict on the appeal by seven individuals who are seeking to quash the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking in all eateries. – The Vibes file pic, September 8, 2022

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal has fixed November 23 to give its verdict on the appeal by seven individuals who are seeking to quash the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking in all eateries.

Justice Datuk Yaacob Md Sam, leading a three-member panel, said they needed more time to deliberate on the issues raised by counsel in the appeal, which were important and of public interest.

The two other judges presiding on the panel were Court of Appeal judge, Datuk M. Gunalan and high court judge, Datuk Lim Chong Fong.

The seven individuals are appealing against the October 29, 2019 decision of the Kuala Lumpur High Court in dismissing their judicial review application to get a certiorari order to quash the Health Ministry's decision to ban smoking at eateries.

The seven are Mohd Hanizam Yunus, 55, Zulkifli Mohamad, 60, Mohd Laisani Dollah, 49, Mohd Sufian Awaludin, 38, Ridzuan Muhammad Noor, 56, Mohd Yazid Mohd Yunus, 51, and Yuri Azhar Abdollah, 43.

At the court proceedings conducted online, lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla representing the individuals, argued that a smoking ban enforced at eateries was unconstitutional, illegal and unreasonable as it was made without proper and thorough research.

He said before the enforcement of the smoking ban at eateries in 2019, smokers in Malaysia could smoke in a special zone provided by owners of air-conditioned and non-air conditioned eateries.

“We submit that this situation is more balanced to the rights of smokers as well as non-smokers where non-smoking patrons at the eateries can choose to sit at a designated place that prohibits smoking and smokers can smoke in places with the open-air concept,” he added.

Haniff said the high court judge had erred in law and in fact, in deciding that his clients' rights under Article 5 of the federal constitution had not been violated and smokers had not been discriminated against under Article 8 of the federal constitution following enforcement of the smoking ban at eateries.

Senior federal counsel, Shamsul Bolhassan, representing the Health Ministry, submitted that banning smoking in eateries was not unreasonable and illegal.

“The right to smoke is not a fundamental right to livelihood, and if individuals choose to smoke, they have to respect the right of non-smokers, and they (smokers) have to move three metres away from the eateries to smoke.

“The law was enacted to ban smoking at eateries, taking into consideration public health and quality of life,” he added.

In their judicial review filed on December 31, 2018 naming the Health Ministry as respondent, the seven men who had set up a society called Persatuan Pertahankan Perokok sought a declaration that the Health Ministry’s decision to ban smoking at eateries was unconstitutional.

They claimed that smokers had equal rights with non-smokers to visit and spend their time at food premises for as long as they wished and that the government did not provide adequate facilities such as smoking areas or include provisions under the smoking ban for eatery operators to prepare their own non-smoking areas.

On January 1, 2019, the Health Ministry imposed a ban on smoking at all restaurants and food premises. – Bernama, September 8, 2022

Related News

Malaysia / 1mth

Judicial review bid over Tuanku Muhriz's removal withdrawn

Malaysia / 3mth

Court quashes RM313.8 million tax bill against Na’imah

Malaysia / 6mth

Court of Appeal: Emergency proclamations beyond judicial review

Malaysia / 8mth

Family takes issue of government responsibility in Altantuya's death to Federal Court

Malaysia / 9mth

Court of Appeal rejects Najib’s bid to reinstate RM1.9m civil suit against Tommy Thomas

Malaysia / 1y

Daim's family gets judicial review to challenge MACC account freeze

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

Malaysia

Chery denies component failure after Tiggo Cross loses wheels in NKVE crash

Malaysia

Northeast Monsoon: MOH prepared and on standby

Malaysia

17-year-old girl found dead near Putrajaya multi-storey car park

Malaysia

Monsoon surge puts 12 Kelantan and Terengganu districts under severe rain warning

Malaysia

Anwar comforts crying child, gives RM50 to replace broken toy car (video)

Malaysia

30 Myanmar nationals among 34 detained in Yuti illegal entry crackdown

Malaysia

Three Malaysians arrested in Mauritius over 76kg cannabis seizure worth RM9.87 million

Malaysia

Malaysia must reduce reliance on foreign workers through automation, robotics, says Johari