Malaysia

1MDB: apex court sets Feb 7 next year to hear prosecution’s appeal on forfeiture

CoA has earlier ruled evidence insufficient to prove assets came from illegal activities

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 18 Oct 2022 10:02PM

1MDB: apex court sets Feb 7 next year to hear prosecution’s appeal on forfeiture
The prosecution seeks to forfeit monies belonging to nine entities, which it alleges were the subject matter or evidence from proceeds of an unlawful activity allegedly committed by former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak. – AFP pic, October 18, 2022

PUTRAJAYA – The Federal Court has fixed February 7 next year to hear the prosecution’s appeals to forfeit monies belonging to nine entities, including Umno and Wanita MCA, allegedly linked to 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) funds.

The hearing date was fixed following case management before Federal Court deputy registrar Siti Hajar Mustaffa today.

Lawyer Gooi Yang Shuh, representing Habib Jewels Sdn Bhd, when contacted, confirmed the hearing date.

The prosecution is appealing against the decisions of the high court and Court of Appeal, which respectively dismissed its forfeiture applications and appeals against Habib Jewels, Hattatex Trading, Wanita MCA, Umno, the Kedah Umno liaison committee and four other individuals, Perano Sdn Bhd, Binsabi Sdn Bhd, and K&Z Enterprise Sdn Bhd.

The Court of Appeal had also ruled against the prosecution and set aside the high court decision that had allowed it to forfeit monies seized from the Pahang Umno liaison committee.

On September 2, last year, the Court of Appeal concluded that there was insufficient evidence to satisfy the court that the monies seized were the subject matter or evidence relating to the commission of an offence or proceeds of unlawful activities. 

The court also said there was absence of any link between the monies in the bank account of the respondents and the funds allegedly misappropriated from 1MDB.

It (the Court of Appeal) held that the offence under section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Act had not been proven and that the monies sought to be forfeited were not traceable to the alleged offence of unlawful activity.

The court also held that even if the money received from former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was from unlawful activities, the high court had correctly ruled that it could not be simply forfeited because the respondents had averred that the money given by Najib between 2012 and 2013 had already been spent after a period of five years and that the money seized in 2018 was from other lawful sources.

The prosecution sought to forfeit RM192,965,413.61 belonging to Umno; RM300,000 from Wanita MCA; RM337,634.78 and RM827,250 respectively from Perano and Binsabi; RM100,000 from Habib Jewels; RM138,359.60 from K&Z Enterprise; RM827,250 from the Kedah Umno liaison committee; and RM111,590 from Hattatex Trading.

It alleged that the seized monies were the subject matter or evidence from proceeds of an unlawful activity allegedly committed by the former prime minister under section 4(1) of the Anti Money Laundering, Anti Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 and Section 23 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Act 2009.

On the same day, the Court of Appeal panel comprising justices Datuk Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil, Datuk Hadhariah Syed Ismail, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais also allowed an appeal by the Pahang Umno liaison committee to set aside a high court decision which allowed the prosecution’s application to forfeit RM2,479,300.18 seized from the committee. – Bernama, October 18, 2022

Related News

Opinion / 9h

When the corrupt are celebrated, what becomes of integrity?

Malaysia / 1w

No 1MDB-scale breaches detected in GLCs, GLICs so far, says Anwar

Malaysia / 3w

Donating to Najib: ‘One of the most foolish things I have seen’ – UM student

Malaysia / 3w

Najib fails to secure stay of 15-year jail term, RM11.38b fine in 1MDB case

Malaysia / 1mth

‘We need more healthcare professionals, not corrupt politicians’ (video)

Malaysia / 1mth

Anwar surprised by Najib's new pardon attempt

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

Malaysia

Malaysia must reduce reliance on foreign workers through automation, robotics, says Johari

Malaysia

Mujahid: Corruption must be rejected, even when committed by our own

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

Android TV boxes may be compromised before reaching consumers, NACSA warns

Malaysia

Malaysia considers fast-tracking quantum migration to strengthen national data security

Malaysia

2 women injured as 2 restaurants catch fire in Brickfields

Malaysia

Foreign suspect held within 24 hours over fatal stabbing of elderly man in Sabah

Malaysia

Health Ministry probes food poisoning complaints involving Gardenia bread and Twiggies

Malaysia

Najib house arrest order: AG acknowledges glaring errors as questions mount