Malaysia

Court of Appeal allows Bar’s challenge over AG’S DNAA decision in Zahid Akalbudi case

Full hearing at the High Court underway for Zahid’s corruption case to challenge the Attorney General’s decision in 2023 in relation to 47 corruption charges linked to Yayasan Akalbudi

Updated 4 months ago · Published on 07 May 2026 10:38AM

Court of Appeal allows Bar’s challenge over AG’S DNAA decision in Zahid Akalbudi case
The Court of Appeal allows the Malaysian Bar to proceed with a judicial review challenge against the AG’s decision to discontinue prosecution via a discharge not amounting to an acquittal - May 7, 2026

THE Malaysian Bar Council has secured a significant legal victory at the Court of Appeal after the bench unanimously granted leave for it to initiate judicial review proceedings challenging the Attorney General’s decision in 2023 to discontinue criminal prosecution against Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi through a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in relation to 47 corruption charges linked to Yayasan Akalbudi.

A three-judge panel chaired by Datuk Faizah Jamaludin ruled that the Bar’s application was not frivolous and raised arguable legal questions that warranted full examination at a substantive hearing before the High Court.

Delivering the unanimous decision of the court, Faizah said the issues raised went to the heart of prosecutorial discretion and the legal limits of the Attorney General’s authority in discontinuing criminal proceedings.

“Leave is granted to the Appellant to commence judicial review against the impugned decision of the Attorney General. The matter is remitted to the High Court for a substantive hearing of the judicial review,” she said, referring to the Malaysian Bar as the appellant in the proceedings.

The panel further emphasised that the application raised more than procedural concerns, describing it as involving issues of significant legal substance.

Faizah noted that the challenge mounted by the Malaysian Bar against the decision to halt prosecution against the second respondent, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, could not be dismissed as trivial.

“The challenge by the Malaysian Bar regarding the position of the Attorney General in discontinuing the prosecution against the second respondent is not frivolous and raises arguable issues.

“This is an unusual, rare and exceptional case which justifies a full judicial review hearing on its merits,” she said.

The Court of Appeal also set aside the earlier decision of the High Court, which had refused to grant leave for judicial review, and ordered that the matter be returned to the High Court for a full substantive hearing.

The panel hearing the appeal comprised Datuk Faizah Jamaludin, Datuk Lim Hock Leng and Datuk Nadzarin Wok Nordin. - May 7, 2026

Spotlight

Malaysia

Bersatu-PAS cooperation ends, Muhyiddin says, as PN rift deepens

Malaysia

Calls grow for arrest of Nadzaruddin, Exco, for treason

Malaysia

Loke offers to resign as Transport Minister following Pardons Board decision

Malaysia

UMNO’s fundraiser for Najib draws sharp criticism on social media

Malaysia

Home Ministry yet to receive formal order on Najib house arrest

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

PH Melaka, Bersatu in talks for wider election pact

You may be interested

Malaysia

DAP considered cabinet resignations before Loke persuaded Nga, other leaders to stay

Malaysia

Two bodies found in car in Alor Gajah, police classify case as sudden death

Malaysia

Anwar: Election wins cannot override constitutional role of Malay Rulers

Malaysia

Zahid: Sanctity, security of Mecca and Madinah must rise above political, military conflicts

Malaysia

Unhealthy air quality hits 23 areas as haze spreads across Malaysia

Malaysia

Najib’s house arrest: Mercy is constitutional, but what about public confidence?

By The Vibes Says

Malaysia

Cloud seeding to tackle haze as PM2.5 levels stay high in Klang Valley

Malaysia

Najib’s RM50m fine: Grassroots feel money could be put to better use for the rakyat