Malaysia

[UPDATED] Najib’s SRC case: appeals court upholds verdict in ‘national embarrassment’

Ex-PM’s actions for personal benefit, not national interest, says judge; full summary of judgment inside

Updated 4 years ago · Published on 08 Dec 2021 10:29AM

[UPDATED] Najib’s SRC case: appeals court upholds verdict in ‘national embarrassment’
Court of Appeal judge Datuk Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil says that Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s actions with regard to the RM4 billion loan to SRC International were not in the national interest but for personal benefit. – SAIRIEN NAFIS/The Vibes file pic, December 8, 2021

by Arjun Mohanakrishnan

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal found that the high court was correct to find former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak guilty for all charges involving corruption over SRC International Sdn Bhd funds. 

Delivering a unanimous judgment, Court of Appeal judge Datuk Abdul Karim Abdul Jalil said there were no errors in findings by high court judge Nazlan Ghazali, given that the prosecution has proven elements of the offences beyond a reasonable doubt.

Among the significant rulings made by the Court of Appeal include that the trial judge had correctly found that Najib had been the shadow director of SRC International.

The Court of Appeal, Karim said, also referred to letters supporting arguments that the money received was actually donations by the Saudi royal family. 

However, the bench found the letters unauthenticated and merely hearsay. 

Karim also mentioned that evidence showed the funds came from SRC International and ended up in Najib’s personal account.

“If they were indeed donations, there was no reason for them to be deposited into SRC International accounts,” Karim said.

He pointed out that Najib’s actions on to the RM4 billion loan to SRC International were not for national interest but for personal benefit.

Karim said that it resulted in no national interest, but rather a national embarrassment.

Expanding further, Karim explained that the defence referred to opinions from those including the former attorney-general. 

However, the Court of Appeal ruled that such opinions could not sway the court.

“The opinions of people such as the attorney-general are not relevant in any proceedings. 

“Such opinions cannot replace evidence to arrive at a just and fair decision,” Karim added. 

Following the decision, Najib’s lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah applied for a stay of execution against the Court of Appeal’s judgment today.

In response, Karim ordered the defence team to submit special circumstances to justify a stay of execution pending appeal to the Federal Court.

In the end, the Court of Appeal granted Najib a stay of execution similar to the terms of bail awarded by the high court previously. 

Earlier, Karim had ruled that the bench also upholds the high court judge’s conviction, RM210 million fine, and 12-year jail term on Najib. – The Vibes, December 8, 2021

Related News

Malaysia / 2mth

Rosmah: ‘There was no obligation for me to buy any of the jewellery’

Opinion / 1y

A tribute revisited: Why I needed hope

Malaysia / 1y

1MDB trial postponed again as Najib remains in hospital

Malaysia / 1y

1MDB trial postponed as Najib warded at HKL

Malaysia / 1y

Jho Low didn’t represent Najib, says Shafee in 1MDB trial

Malaysia / 1y

Najib brought Malaysia to excellence, says Zahid’s daughter

Spotlight

Malaysia

Review dismissed, Mohd Isa remains in prison for six years

Education

Racism and bigotry in Malaysian higher education are spilling over to social media

Malaysia

Luxury watches, jewellery seized from ex-army chief’s sister-in-law become government property

Malaysia

Undang Luak Rembau to be installed tomorrow

Malaysia

Govt seeks RM1.06 billion in compensation over cancelled naval missile deal

Malaysia

Johor state polls: Pace gathers as 553 nomination forms sold

Sports & Fitness

World Cup 2026 becomes highest-scoring tournament in history with record-breaking 173rd goal

Malaysia

Female e-hailing driver goes viral after installing metal barrier for protection (video)

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

'No case to answer' in suit against Vinod Sekhar

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

You may be interested

Malaysia

Acute emotional distress may have impaired Zara's judgement before death - psychiatrist

Malaysia

Babysitter remanded in 11-month-old baby death probe

Malaysia

PN unveils Johor poll line-up as Bersatu, PAS and MIPP field veterans and fresh faces

Malaysia

Govt seeks RM1.06 billion in compensation over cancelled naval missile deal

Malaysia

BN Johor election manifesto promises jobs, housing and RM100m youth funds

Malaysia

PAC: GL holders charged excessively compared to cash-paying patients

Malaysia

'Back door' university admission claims: Jitra assemblyman charged

Malaysia

Johor PRN: Suraya, Pejuang's sole candidate to represent PN, contests in Gambir