Malaysia

‘Najib’s defence sought adjournment only to postpone hearing’

Lead prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram lambasts ‘audacity’ of ex-PM’s legal team

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 22 Feb 2023 1:18PM

‘Najib’s defence sought adjournment only to postpone hearing’
Datuk V. Sithambaram (pic) says that Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s defence team had already known the dates for the trials four months in advance, while necessary documents pertaining to the case had been given to the defence team two months prior to the trial in August of 2022. – AZIM RAHMAN/The Vibes file pic, February 22, 2023

by Danial Dzulkifly

PUTRAJAYA – All the defence team wanted in Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s application to review his conviction and sentence in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case at the Federal Court was to get the trial postponed, the prosecution said today.

Lead prosecutor Datuk V. Sithambaram, in his submission to the apex court today, said Najib’s lead counsel, then Datuk Hisyam Teh Poh Teik, as well as solicitors from Zaid Ibrahim Suflan TH Liew & Partners, all had as their main objective the adjournment of the review after they failed their bid to introduce new evidence at the last minute.

The new evidence was a supposed conflict of interest with high court judge Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali, who found Najib guilty in July 2020, because of Nazlan’s previous role in Maybank as general counsel, which exposed him to knowledge about SRC International.

Sithambaram said that Najib’s defence team had already known the dates for the trials four months in advance, while necessary documents pertaining to the case had been given to the defence team two months prior to the trial in August of 2022.

He posited that Najib and his new legal team had six to eight weeks to prepare for the appeals, but did not prepare because they assumed that the application for additional evidence would succeed, and the case would be remitted to the high court.

“The applicant and his new counsels’ insisted on an adjournment saying they were not ready to proceed with the appeals.

“This, we submit, is a strategy that went wrong and a clear demonstration of complacency in the preparation of the hearing of the appeals.

“No solicitor should have the audacity to accept a brief and appear on the hearing date with the sole aim of securing an adjournment without being prepared for the eventuality that the appeals may proceed,” he said.

Ahead of Najib’s appeal to the Federal Court last year, he had on July 25, 2022 written to the apex court that he was to discharge Shafee & Co from representing him in the final appeal.

Hisyam and Zaid were then replaced as lead counsel and solicitor respectively.

During the trial however, Hisyam repeatedly asked for adjournment and even requested to discharge himself, but was denied by the previous five-person panel led by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat.

During the final appeal hearing, Zaid’s firm was discharged as solicitors, leaving Hisyam and his two co-counsels to represent Najib.

The Federal Court on August 23 upheld Najib’s conviction and sentence to 12 years in prison and RM210 million fine.

The decision was made by the bench led by Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, comprising Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and apex court judges Datuk Nallini Pathmanathan, Datuk Mary Lim, and Datuk Mohamad Zabidin Diah.

In this review application, the five-person panel is led by Sabah and Sarawak chief judge Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebl and comprise Datuk Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang, Datuk Nordin Hassan, and Datuk Abu Bakar Jais. – The Vibes, February 22, 2023

Related News

Malaysia / 1mth

Najib called the shots on SRC matters, including RM4 bil KWAP loan: ex-director

Malaysia / 2mth

AGC yet to decide on Najib’s request to drop charges of RM27 mil SRC case

Malaysia / 3mth

Najib’s team slam Ramkarpal, others for not grasping facts of his case, invite televised debate

Malaysia / 5mth

Najib applies for DNAA in RM27 million SRC case

Malaysia / 7mth

Federal court dismisses Najib’s leave to appeal bid to lift Mareva injunction in SRC International lawsuit

7mth

Najib received US$30 mil from Jho Low’s shell company in 2012: witness

Spotlight

Malaysia

Petros to take over natural gas buying, selling from Petronas from July 1

By Desmond Davidson

Malaysia

Sarawak achieves breakthrough in producing ‘rice’ from sago starch

By Desmond Davidson

Malaysia

Johor MB refutes Forest City casino reports as baseless, malicious

Education

Convent Light Street conversion to international school 'on track'

By Ian McIntyre

Malaysia

Govt to address AstraZeneca vaccine worries this week

Malaysia

Perikatan loses KKB as voting trends stick

By Ravin Palanisamy

You may be interested

Malaysia

Minister vows to repair 58 Sabah clinics this year

By Jason Santos

Malaysia

Sarawak urged to record traditions of 3 tribes on verge of extinction

By Stephen Then

Malaysia

Group asks govt to regulate fares to help e-hailing drivers

Malaysia

Another uprooted tree damages vehicles in KL, causes road closure

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

KKB results show Perikatan can't penetrate mixed seats

By Ravin Palanisamy

Malaysia

KKB by-election win shows govt parties united, says Zahid

Malaysia

Football players told to be alert, hire bodyguards

By Alfian Z.M. Tahir

Malaysia

US$5,000 reward for missing Malaysian Everest climber