Malaysia

Muslim convert denied leave to appeal in bid to renounce Islam

Federal Court dismisses application by a Muslim convert seeking to renounce Islam and return to Christianity, affirming Syariah Court’s jurisdiction over matters of religious conversion

Updated 1 year ago · Published on 02 Oct 2025 4:42PM

Muslim convert denied leave to appeal in bid to renounce Islam
Court rules matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court - October 2, 2025

A MUSLIM convert has failed to secure leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision dismissing his attempt to renounce Islam and revert to Christianity.

The Federal Court bench, led by Court of Appeal President Datuk Abu Bakar Jais, ruled that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court.

Justice Abu Bakar, delivering the decision, stated that “the applicant’s judicial review seeking a declaration that he is no longer a Muslim falls under the jurisdiction of the Syariah Court.”

He added the legal questions raised were neither novel nor of constitutional significance and that the applicant did not meet the threshold required under Section 96 (a) and (b) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964.

The court referred to previous rulings, including the Federal Court’s decision in Soon Singh Bikar Singh v Pertubuhan Kebajikan Islam Malaysia (Perkim) Kedah & Anor, upheld in Rosliza Ibrahim v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor & Anor, confirming the Syariah Court’s authority in matters of Islamic renunciation. The application was dismissed with no order as to costs.

The applicant, who converted to Islam and married a Muslim woman in 2010 before divorcing in 2015, first filed to renounce Islam in the Syariah Court in 2016. His request was dismissed, with the court ordering counselling sessions. Subsequent appeals within the Syariah judicial system were also rejected.

Following these rulings, the man sought civil court intervention to nullify the Syariah Court’s decisions and affirm his right to profess Christianity.

His judicial review was dismissed by the High Court in 2023, and the Court of Appeal upheld this dismissal earlier this year.

During the Federal Court hearing, the applicant’s lawyer, Iqbal Harith Liang, presented two legal questions but declined to advise his client to return to the Syariah Court, describing it as “functus officio.”

Senior Federal Counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly@Arwi argued that the legal questions were not new, while lawyer Kamaruzaman Arif, representing the Federal Territory Islamic Religious Council, maintained that the applicant could still pursue his case in the Syariah Court. - October 2, 2025

Spotlight

Malaysia

Bersama suspends Nik Nazmi from party activities for three months

Malaysia

‘We have better things to do than orchestrate khalwat raids’ - Amirudin

Malaysia

Social media posts ‘emerge’- defending Ismail after Tuanku Muhriz’s public rebuke

World

Trump’s Muhammad joke about Iran presidency falls flat at Georgia rally

Health

Haze can cause life-threatening lung inflammation in cats and dogs, vet warns

World

Australia detects deadly H5N1 bird flu on Macquarie Island, threatening elephant seals

Malaysia

Agong warns against using social media to spread hatred, insult others

Malaysia

Nik Nazmi acknowledges he is the individual detained by JAIS

You may be interested

Malaysia

Cannabis haul seized in Thailand could fetch RM1.96m in Malaysia

Malaysia

Five states reopen schools as haze forces exam delays and outdoor curbs

Malaysia

Disabled workers’ public sector representation must more than triple by 2030

Malaysia

Man found dead with 70 per cent burns beside Johor railway tracks

Malaysia

Woman arrested after headless baby found in Terengganu drain

Malaysia

Warning: MOF debunks viral poster claiming QR payment charges start on Nov 1

Malaysia

JPN warns against recycling 2023 Saifuddin wedding video to avoid public confusion

Malaysia

Cable thieves face tougher punishment as govt targets rail disruptions