Malaysia

Ten former Bar Council presidents affirm Tuanku Muhriz as rightful Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri

They asserted that the move by the Exco raised serious constitutional questions and concerns regarding the rule of law, noting that it was carried out without stated grounds, due process, or an inquiry.

Updated 1 month ago · Published on 21 Sep 2026 5:40PM

Ten former Bar Council presidents affirm Tuanku Muhriz as rightful Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri
They further alleged that Tuanku Muhriz was never informed of any allegations against him nor allowed to be heard. - September 21, 2026

TEN former Bar Council Presidents have questioned the action taken by the Negeri Sembilan State Executive Council (EXCO) in announcing the removal of the Ruler of Negeri Sembilan, Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, on September 16.

They asserted that the move raised serious constitutional questions and concerns regarding the rule of law, noting that it was carried out without stated grounds, due process, or an inquiry.

In a joint statement dated September 21, 2026, they stated that the process for removing the Ruler of Negeri Sembilan is governed by Article 10 of the Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan 1959, which includes a requirement for a full and comprehensive inquiry to be conducted by the Undangs.

However, they claimed there was no evidence that such an inquiry had taken place, nor were there any publicly known charges or allegations of misconduct against Tuanku Muhriz.

They further alleged that Tuanku Muhriz was never informed of any allegations against him nor allowed to be heard.

The statement also questioned the validity of the Proclamation dated April 19, 2026, including allegations that the Menteri Besar, Datuk Ismail Lasim, signed the document under duress and subsequently lodged a police report.

They pointed out an inconsistency: the proclamation was dated April 19, yet Ismail only signed it on August 3, 2026. He was not the Menteri Besar on April 19.

They further contended that the EXCO lacked the mandate, jurisdiction, or constitutional authority to remove a state ruler.

They added that the invalidity of the proclamation had been confirmed by the Dewan Keadilan dan Undang and the Attorney General's Chambers, while the State Secretary's Office reportedly concurred with the Attorney General's Chambers' position and refused to proceed with the gazetting process.

All 10 former Bar Council presidents urged the Federal Government to intervene to resolve the issue and called on all parties to respect the Federal Constitution and the Laws of the Constitution of Negeri Sembilan 1959.

They also affirmed Tuanku Muhriz’s position as the rightful Yang di-Pertuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan, while warning that these developments could set a precedent for the constitutional monarchy system.

The statement was signed by Datuk Mah Weng Kwai, Datuk Kuthubul Zaman Bukhari, Datuk Yeo Yang Poh, Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, Ragunath Kesavan, Datuk Lim Chee Wee, Christopher Leong, Datuk George Varughese, Salim Bashir and Karen Cheah Yee Lynn.- September 21, 2026

Related News

Malaysia / 6d

Ismail’s move to seek Tuanku Muhriz’s consent seen as recognition of ruler’s legitimacy

Malaysia / 3w

Suspicion over fake accounts defending Ismail after royal rebuke

Malaysia / 3w

‘Am I not the Tuanku?’ Tuanku Muhriz tells off Ismail Lasim (video)

Malaysia / 3w

Tuanku Muhriz: Adat cannot be upheld by breaking its own rules

Malaysia / 3w

Jelebu chieftain’s installation takes place at Istana Besar Seri Menanti today

Malaysia / 4w

Tuanku Muhriz to focus on state affairs; Will not attend Conference of Rulers meeting

Spotlight

Opinion

Can Najib break Madani?

World

Trump offers UFC CEO the position of Press Secretary

Malaysia

Building a great nation begins with happy families, says Anwar

Malaysia

Anwar should sack BN ministers who are not aligned with him – Muhyiddin

Malaysia

AGC rejects claims of defying King’s decree on Najib

Malaysia

Deepavali: Selangor Sultan calls on Malaysians to strengthen unity, reject hatred

Malaysia

If there were still obstacles, why accept the RM50m payment, asks Najib’s daughter

Malaysia

Where did UMNO's RM50 million payment for Najib's release come from?

By The Vibes Says

You may be interested

Malaysia

MOH investigates food poisoning complaints linked to bread product

Malaysia

PH Melaka seeks early voter support for federal government's policy direction

Malaysia

Malaysian man with two criminal records held in Brunei’s record 102kg drug bust

Malaysia

30 Myanmar nationals among 34 detained in Yuti illegal entry crackdown

Malaysia

32.3 million WhatsApp users in Malaysia face malware threat

Malaysia

Malaysia considers fast-tracking quantum migration to strengthen national data security

Malaysia

Chery denies component failure after Tiggo Cross loses wheels in NKVE crash

Malaysia

The question remains: Who paid Najib's RM50m fine?